You are here: Home / Long Term Tests / Update: BMW X5



Latest topCar Blogs

Reader Blogs

Newsletter

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Update: BMW X5

By: 
Angus Thompson

Fri, 2011/11/18 - 8:35am — asholdfield

Update: BMW X5
By: 
Angus Thompson

ONE HAS TO wonder what we did before cellphones, microwaves or even televisions and satellite navigation. The simple answer is: we were less stressed, ate less, read more and got lost … a lot. Living with the X5 spoils you. I remember backing up and manoeuvring my previous Hilux with little to guide me other than its rear view mirrors and mostly good judgement. You basically parked the beast by braille as the big single cab’s rear load bay was sky high and loomed like a lorry out the rear. Since the big X5 arrived last November I’ve slowly got to trust the accuracy of its rear view camera. With Top and Side view cameras it’s a R12 600 option on the big 40d, but hugely helpful when reversing in tight confines.

The system has two cameras integrated in the front bumper, one on the left and one on the right. Both images are displayed in the Control Display with interactive lane lines allowing one to judge the vehicle’s intended path and check if the parking space is indeed large enough. The zoom function also allows you to adjust the image so that you can get the towbar right up to a trailer hitch without the need for outside assistance.

The Top View cameras in the wing mirrors (together with the data from the Rear View camera) generate a bird’s eye image of the X5 and its immediate surrounds, which is great for navigating tight fence posts and gates.

On the connectivity front, I recently switched over from an iPod Nano to a smaller shuffle. I found the X5’s iDrive system doesn’t locate the library of the smaller device using the standard USB port. I’m told it works with a standard auxiliary cable and that one has to use the shuffle setting on the device to search for songs manually. And they say these things make our lives simpler.

PREVIOUS UPDATE HERE

Spec
Specs: 

UPS | Rear view camera is a big help in tight confines 

DOWNS | Add the Side View option and it gets pricey 

ODO READING AT START/NOW | 4 362/20 969km

DISTANCE COVERED | 16 607km

FUEL CONSUMED | 1642.78L

AV. FUEL CONSUMPTION | 10.3?/100km

SERVICE INTERVAL | Determined by OBC

SERVICE COST | Covered by 5-yr/100 000km

TOTAL FUEL COST | R16 372.88

RUNNING COST | 99c/km

Your rating: None Average: 3.4 (8 votes)

Comments

Olla's picture

definite need

sorry to dissapoint guys, but you won't know what its like until you experince it yourself. This additional parking aid is really helpful and mayb worth the extra cost, consider what it will cost to repair your bumper and rear fenders if damage during a parking manuvouers

Sihle Dube's picture

BMW Giezmoz

I totally like your article an it's so true. I switch on the parking sensors as well as I drive into my packed garage. The car is automatic, so no unnecessary stress on peak-hour traffic. But when I drive the small car, a C3, you would swear I just got my licence. 


Intersting opinions over all. 

Anonymous's picture

parking sensors a waste of money

There's no need for parking sensors. It's much cheaper and more useful to put a towbar on. With a towbar your chances of parking lot damage when reversing up against small cars is negligible.

Anonymous's picture

agreed

Hahaha !

 

I completely agree.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

Featured Video

Polls

What's your opinion on the number of doors your car should have?: