MORE GOLF BLUEMOTION AND HONDA INSIGHT IMAGES HERE
OKAY, IN THE context of some of the heavyweight shootouts we’ve had in Topcar, you might think this one’s as exciting as watching two unwashed tie-dyed toppies pelting each other with tofu. A 1.3-litre petrol-electric hybrid Honda with a CVT gearbox up against a ubiquitous diesel Volksie Golf isn’t exactly a petrolhead’s idea of ‘died and gone to heaven’, is it?
After driving these two cars for a month over the festive season (penance for being mean to bunny-huggers and tree-gropers in my youth?), there’s a part of me that’s thankful it’s over. But there’s more to this than selfish relief at jumping back behind the wheel of something which offers a jolt of adrenaline instead of just transport.
The Honda Insight and the Volkswagen Golf BlueMotion, launched without much fanfare, might just be two of the most important cars of the year. Not because they’re the solution to ‘sustainable mobility’ as oil runs out and the earth heats up (they’re not), but because they are crucial stop-gap products that will soothe consciences and keep eco-legislators at bay while the search for the Holy Grail continues.
Both the Honda and the Volkswagen claim radically low fuel consumption and CO2 figures, but it’s the real world practicality of these claims and the very different approach followed by each manufacturer which makes this shootout fascinating.
Is that a Prius?
In the one corner we have the Honda Insight, and it looks exactly like we’ve been conditioned to think a hybrid should. In other words, it looks like a Toyota Prius. A sleek, aerodynamic wedge with a tapering rear announces to the world that you’re a responsible citizen and not a polluting [filtered word] like all the other SUV-loving philistines out there.
Honda understandably bridles at the Prius comparison, saying it borrows its shape from the FCX Clarity fuel cell car and that it looks the way it does to boost aerodynamic efficiency.
The Golf, on the other hand, does not look like a Prius at all. It doesn’t have to since it’s not a hybrid. Instead it looks like any of the thousands of other Golfs on our roads. Look closer though and you’ll see all kinds of aerodynamic tweaks that differentiate the BlueMotion. These include low rolling resistance tyres, lightweight alloys, lower suspension, a modified radiator grille, side skirt extensions and a roof edge spoiler. Even the underbody has been given some aerodynamic tweaks to lower the Golf’s drag coefficient. What you end up with is quite a sporty looking Golf with subtle BlueMotion badging that whispers ‘clever driver’ rather than ‘pretentious celebrity’.
Both cars are five-door family hatchbacks retailing for less than R270 000 (R259 900 for the Honda and R265 600 for the VW), but that’s pretty much where the similarities end. The Insight’s cabin is surprisingly roomy and mainstream, considering Honda had to incorporate a battery pack into the chassis. While 400 litres of cargo space and flexible seating sounds good on paper, the sloping roofline means that headroom for adults in the back is actually quite tight. The standard spec count is high though, and includes electric windows, climate control, electric mirrors, cruise control, remote central locking, a six-speaker sound system with an iPod/USB port as well as front, side and curtain airbags.









Comments
i haven't drive any of the
i haven't drive any of the two cars. but, my friend said he already drove the volks golf bluemotion. what he noticed about volks, it blows much pollution in the air. well since i haven't drive this volks, i will just cosider it as a hearsay. well for me i think i much prefer to drive honda insight. i just wonder if which of of thw two car are easy to auto repair?
Golf Bluemotion
I would love to take the honda for a test drive. I have however had the pleasure of diving the golf, for starters i must say that the drive is great. Up hill's - no problem, the gears seem smooth and the car is great overall. However i cant understand how VW has managed to put in those horid seats...
I can see right through the bias in this report. Ag Sies!
For starters, the diesel emissions from the VW still pollute the air more than the petrol from the Honda and as the diesel Volkswagen gets older the more it is likely to do so, so yes, maybe you should not even begin to compare the vehicles. I drove the Insight and yes, there is little to fault it on really, other than the low aerodynamic roof-line, because it is what it says it is, but the golf is not what you're trying to say it is. Why you find fault with the Honda's steering beats me. I drove the Honda and was very impressed by how light and direct the feel actually was, and I thought what a bonus that would be for women who's arms are not always as strong as us men.
Overall I thought if I were in the market for a hybrid vehicle the Honda would make my short-list for sure! I found nothing in the Honda that I disliked with the exception of the sound it emitted when going pedal to the metal on a steep incline!
I'm sure that when clean diesel is fully available in this country, that more folk like myself would start to consider diesel as an alternative option.
After reading this 'so-called' comparison, it's funny how blatant this kind of reporting screams of bias, simply by the snide and unasked for pathetic little remarks and the glaringly missing omitted script that did not follow when expected; which makes one think of two little boys comparing their dad's cars! It also smacks of unprofessionalism in a classy magazine like TopCar. One wonders if the Editor even perused the article. Don't forget that the readers who read these articles are car-lovers regardless of 'brand preference or bias' and when someone tries to make a car look or seem bad, by what they write, even when it's not, one sometimes thinks that this reporter can't write a personal and unbiased test report without proffering what he's heard other's expounding on before. It would be the same as me saying; "There is really only one Volkswagen I'd buy and that's a GTI, and I don't care about the rest!"
All we as readers' ask is that you are honest with us and not think that we don't know the real truth about any car. So please be objective. Cars are like women; Yes, many cars are not so pretty but that does not mean there is not something else in them that is very beautiful and will make a man's heart beat faster, such as being economical to maintain. So here's to those not so beautiful cars!
Post new comment